US property cat renewals see wide range of pricing outcomes at April 1st: Gallagher Re

While the April 1st reinsurance renewal is a smaller affair for property catastrophe accounts in the United States, broker Gallagher Re reports a wide-range of pricing outcomes, dependent on loss experience, with risk-adjusted rates on-line falling as much as 15% for loss free accounts, or rising as much as 15% for catastrophe loss hit.

“In a relatively light renewal period, nationwide account dynamics were broadly a continuation of the themes witnessed at the 1.1.2025 renewals,” Gallagher Re explained.

Adding that, “Reinsurers were highly focused on the impact of the January Californian wildfires, with buyers focused on differentiating both approach to the peril / geography and the outcomes from the event(s).”

However, impacted renewals were small in number and outcomes at the April reinsurance renewal for US cedants were highly dependent on loss experience and also program size.

Catastrophe loss free accounts property catastrophe reinsurance rates on-line came in with -5% to -15% reductions, on a risk-adjusted basis, Gallagher Re reports.

But, catastrophe loss hit US accounts saw property cat rates ranging from flat to +15%.

Risk loss free property reinsurance treaties renewed from flat to -5%, while risk loss hit property renewals saw rates-on-line ranging from +5% to as much as +20%, Gallagher Re said.

Which drives home the wide-range of outcomes and the influence of losses on property and property catastrophe reinsurance appetites and pricing at this time.

Despite the wildfires in January, Gallagher Re noted that capacity for US property catastrophe risks remained ample at the April 1st 2025 renewals.

Buyers took advantage of the increased capital supply to hold their retention levels constant, and push price reductions at the top end of their towers, typically the most competitive layers.

Due to increased capacity for property risks, Gallagher Re said there was increased demand for aggregate covers at the renewals with more placements seen as well.

“Several carriers sought to bolster existing aggregate programs, while others looked to establish new programs. That said, these aggregate protections continued to be pitched at the capital preservation, not earnings protection level,” Gallagher Re explained.

Read all of our reinsurance renewals news and analysis.