Samsung Galaxy A36 5G vs Galaxy S24 FE: Don’t make the obvious mistake

Intro
The Galaxy A36 is here, and Samsung is surely hoping that it will become its mid-range success story in 2025, or at least fill in the gaps that the upcoming Galaxy A56 will leave gape open. The phone features a slightly different design language, much faster charging, some AI features, a new Qualcomm chipset, and a straightforward-to-stomach $400 price tag.
Should you go for the Galaxy A36 or the Galaxy S24 FE? That’s the question we’re trying to answer in this comparison, and spoiler alert, you should probably abstain from getting the Galaxy A36––the Galaxy S24 FE is simply better in every regard, so totally worth it.Â
Galaxy A36 vs Galaxy S24 FE differences:
Galaxy A36 5G | Galaxy S24 FE |
---|---|
Thinner 7.4mm plastic body | Slightly thicker at 8mm, with an aluminum frame |
Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chip (5nm) | Samsung Exynos 2400e chipset (4nm) on deck |
Triple camera system with macro | Triple camera system with 3X telephoto |
Larger 5,000mAh battery | 4,700mAh battery on board |
45W wired charging, no wireless charging | 25W wired charging, 15 wireless charging and reverse wireless charging supported |
$400 starting price | $650 starting price |
Awesome Intelligence (Circle to Search, Object Eraser) | Galaxy AI (A more powerful and comprehensive AI suite) |
Six years of software updates | Seven years of software updates |
Design and Display
The Galaxy S24 FE is the more premium device (Image by PhoneArena)
The Galaxy S24 FE is the more premium device (Image by PhoneArena)
The Galaxy A36 5G generally boasts the same design language as its predecessor, following the now signature Galaxy styling with a flat frame and flat display. The phone is 7.4mm thin, which is decent for a mid-ranger and makes it delightfully compact. However, to keep costs down, the Galaxy A36 features a plastic frame.Â
The Key Island, which houses the hardware buttons, remains a staple on the right side of the Galaxy A36 (Image by PhoneArena)
In comparison, the Galaxy S24 FE, on the other hand, has an aluminum frame and could end up being slightly narrower and thicker than the Galaxy A36. It follows the design language of the Galaxy S24 lineup pretty closely, but has no differentiating features.Â
There’s no Key Island here: the right-hand side of the phone is flush, which is a design feature more consistent with Samsung’s flagships.Â
Colors-wise, the Galaxy S24 FE is available in Blue, Graphite, Gray, Yellow, and Mint colors. The Galaxy A36 5G, on the other hand, comes in Awesome Lavender, Awesome Black, Awesome White, and Awesome Lime colors. Aside from the black one, all the others are subtle pastel hues. Â
Pretty similar displays, all things considered (Image by PhoneArena)
The Galaxy A36 5G’s screen has grown to 6.7 inches, an improvement compared to the Galaxy A35’s 6.60-inch screen. It’s also a Super AMOLED screen with a 60/120Hz refresh rate, which is smooth but not as sophisticated as flagship-level devices that can tone it down to 10 or even 1Hz. The peak brightness is 1,200 nits here, which is great and makes sure you will have no issues with legibility.Â
As per our tests, the two displays are surprisingly similar in terms of measured properties, with similar peak brightness and color accuracy. Basically, you get the same screen on both devices.Â
The Galaxy S24 FE has an optical fingerprint scanner, and the Galaxy A36 has followed suit. In the hierarchy, those are a step below ultrasonic fingerprint sensors, which are both faster and more accurate.
Performance and Software
The Galaxy S24 FE delivers better performance (Image by PhoneArena)
The Galaxy A36 5G uses the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3chip, a 5nm mid-range affair which aims to strike a balance between performance and battery life on a tight budget. This would be yet another chipset change for the Galaxy A36, as its predecessors switch up between Exynos and MediaTek chips each year.Â
In the other corner, the Galaxy S24 FE relies on an in-house chipset: the Exynos 2400e, which is a very potent chipset with pretty impressive graphics performance. It’s just a tad slower than the Exynos 2400 inside Samsung’s Galaxy S24 and S24 Plus, so it’s definitely nearly flagship-grade.
CPU Performance Benchmarks:
According to our in-house synthetic benchmark tests, the Galaxy S24 FE performs significantly better, which comes to no surprise.Â
GPU Performance
In the 3DMark graphics benchmark tests that we conducted, the Galaxy S24 FE pretty much left the Galaxy A36 in the proverbial dust with a significantly better graphics performance.Â
The Galaxy A36 features just 6GB of RAM, which might be the reason for the limited AI capabilities in comparison with the Galaxy S24 FE. Samsung has also thrown some AI features on the Galaxy A36. Dubbed Awesome Intelligence, these include Circle to Search and an Object Eraser in the Gallery app.
Galaxy A36 users will be enjoying six years of software updates. The Galaxy S24 FE will be supported for seven years, just like the company’s proper Galaxy S24 flagship lineup. Great!
Camera
No competition (Image by PhoneArena)
The Galaxy A36 5G boasts a mostly unchanged camera system in comparison with the Galaxy A35. We get a 50MP main camera, 8MP ultrawide, and a 5MP macro camera, which is a gimmicky addition. The main camera also allows you to take 2X photos with great quality thanks to sensor cropping.Â
Not a particularly exciting camera setup, but it will do the job for the occasional photo, just don’t count on the quality being in the same ballpark as the Galaxy S24 FE. The latter comes with a 50MP main, 12MP ultrawide, and an 8MP telephoto with 3X optical zoom, which is a drastically more versatile and usable setup.Â
Now, in our PhoneArena Camera test, the Galaxy A36 doesn’t fare particularly well, and the differences between the affordable and the Fan Edition phone are obvious. Quality-wise, the Galaxy S24 FE to ultimately be the superior phone, and with a score of just 120, the A36 can’t really stand up to it.Â
The latter delivers significantly better image quality with superior dynamic range, better colors, and more natural detail.Â
Photo Samples
Video Quality
Battery Life and Charging
Even Stevens
Battery life is not a major differentiating point here (Image by PhoneArena)
Battery life is not a major differentiating point here (Image by PhoneArena)
Both phones perform rather similarly in our custom battery life tests, achieving around 6 hours and 20 minutes of average battery life. The two phones achieve very similar results in our web browsing, video streaming, and 3D gaming tests.Â
PhoneArena Battery and Charging Test Results:
Surprisingly, we get 45W wired charging with the Galaxy A36.Â
Specs Comparison
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
---|---|---|
Size, weight | 162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm, 195 gr | 162 x 77.3 x 8 mm, 213 gr |
Screen | 6.7″ Super AMOLED 60-120Hz Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
6.6″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X 60-120Hz Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5nm) | Exynos 2400e (4nm) |
RAM, Storage | 6GB/128GB 6GB/256GB |
8GB/128GB 8GB/256GB |
Cameras | 50MP main 8MP ultrawide 5MP macro 12MP front |
50MP main 12MP ultrawide 8MP 3X telephoto 10MP front |
Battery | 5,000mAh | 4,700mAh |
Charging | USB-C 45W wired |
USB-C 25W wired 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
Summary
It’s hard not to get the Galaxy S24 FE (Image by PhoneArena)
Launching at $400 in the US, there’s definitely potential for speculation to be made that it could undercut the Galaxy S24 FE, which starts at $650.
Ultimately, however, you get what you pay for, and the much lower price of the mid-ranger is pretty telling. It is not as powerful and has a less impressive camera in comparison with the Galaxy S24 FE.Â
The value is just better on the Galaxy S24 FE, which happens to be merely a step beneath Samsung’s proper flagships, so it’s always a recommended purchase, if your budget allows it.Â